A brief synoptic parallel — Taking the side of the ‘modern’ in philosophy — Old and new relations between science and philosophy — Matrices and principles. Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’. : Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy ( ) by Francois Laruelle and a great selection of similar New, Used and.
|Published (Last):||27 April 2011|
|PDF File Size:||12.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In any event, we already have good precedent in the field of mathematics. Undertaking a philosophical project in the genre of polemic is always dangerous.
François Laruelle, Anti-Badiou: On the Introduction of Maoism Into Philosophy – PhilPapers
In its current iteration he has attempted to “conjugate” philosophy with quantum physics. At face value, the two have much in common: In the process he also ends up presenting his own project using Badiou’s as a contrasting counter-model.
Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’ and explains why the fo are in fact radically different. The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy.
Short note on Laruelle’s Anti-Badiou
The stance of Anti-Badiou is not to negate or replace Badiou’s picture of reality with another, but only to see it as one amongst many within a democracy of thought.
To og Badiou and Derrida in this way — what a monstrous thought! He also packs a few powerful punches: But the paradigm, that which moves around each other not in opposition. Most of his targets, however, have not been philosophers of talent equal to his own, and so he has rarely risked as much as Laruelle does here. The book traces a conceptual portrait of a Badiou that is more an artefact of Laruelle’s method than a faithful image. This nitroduction one of the aims of the book: If the risk of a polemic is that the polemicist falls flat in his own writing, Laruelle quite deftly does not try to meet Badiou punch for punch.
AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally. East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. At face value, the two have much in common: As counting should be differentiated from numbers. In part introduchion casting of philosophy as material is what Laruelle means by “disempowering” what is also translated by Mackay as depotentializing and elsewhere, in relation to ecological concerns, the “degrowth of” philosophy.
Write a customer review.
Notify me of new posts via email. Allow me to explain. For Laruelle, philosophy must be “mutated” anti-basiou its engagement with another discipline, and he has set up, in other texts, the theoretical framework for what that change — in terms of the division of labor between philosophy and extra-philosophical domains — would look like.
Get to Know Us. We require further details as to the new version of non-philosophy, and as to the analytic means that will allow us to detect in Badiou the indestructible residue of philosophy, and its conservation-reeducation by Cantor and Mao under the sign of Plato.
Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’ and explains why the two are in fact radically different.
Perhaps unlike the Greek playwright, Laruelle’s polemic also reveals something true about the character of Badiou’s philosophy. But what we also see ,aoism this final chapter is the scope of non-philosophy, a scope that moves from what we would normally refer to as meta-philosophy, to epistemology, then to philosophy of religion, and finally to ethics and political philosophy.
From this very programmatic chapter he then moves to two chapters that make up the primary polemic of the book.
The World Before Worlds: While Laruelle has developed his project over a number of decades, he has always attempted to engage with new material in order to challenge and deepen the project. A brief synoptic parallel — Taking the side of the ‘modern’ in philosophy — Old and new relations between science and philosophy — Matrices and principles — Subtraction and superposition — Philosophy and mathematics in the mirror — Ontology and materiality — Philo-fiction.
It is an attempt to model the ways in which Kant’s philosophy was intimately influenced by the Newtonian model of physics. Yet it is on the basis of this decision that philosophy can claim self-sufficiency and ultimately its ability to philosophize everything. There will be purges as well, a new purification of philosophy, Laruelle tells us. Selected pages Title Page.
This book contains Laruelle’s only fully worked out case study, putting his more general ideas to the test of an individual example. Or should we rather aim for ibtroduction scientific-type knowledge of philosophy, a knowledge that would no lhilosophy be contingent, but which, this time, would truly escape such doxa?
Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. The Real of immanence, by virtue of the particle that it lhilosophy, is the non-dialectical solution to contradiction and to antinomies. Explore the Home Gift Guide. But this is no ordinary intriduction, this is the inversion of Gnosticism without god, and venture into the democracy of thought, that is at once an attack upon the academic aristocracy, and a realignment with the scientific movement of thinking kntroduction knowing at the conjuncture of the real.
In turn, Laruelle explains the contrast with his own non-philosophy as a true democracy of thought that breaks philosophy’s continual enthrall with mathematics and instead opens up a myriad of ‘non-standard’ places where thinking can be found and practised.
In meeting Badiou’s own acerbic attacks on Laruelle and other philosophers like Deleuze and Derridahe shows us that Badiou is a philosopher — and that this is precisely the problem, however obvious a statement it may seem. Added to PP index Total downloads 14of 2, Recent downloads 6 months tehof 2, How can I increase my downloads?